The Hidden Hidden Gaps in Amazon Reports: What Sellers Are Missing in 2025

The Hidden Hidden Gaps in Amazon Reports: What Sellers Are Missing in 2025

Introduction

Amazon provides sellers with dozens of reports covering sales, inventory, advertising, fees, and performance. On the surface, it looks like everything a seller needs is already available. Yet many experienced sellers eventually discover that without a dedicated Amazon seller tool, Amazon’s native reports leave major blind spots.

The problem isn’t a lack of data — it’s fragmentation, missing context, and delayed visibility. Amazon’s reports tell sellers what happened, but rarely explain why it happened, what it cost, or what action to take next.

This is why advanced sellers increasingly rely on an Amazon seller tool like Sentrykit to connect data across profitability, operations, and account risk.

In this article, we’ll break down the most critical gaps in Amazon’s native reporting, explain why they matter, and show what sellers are missing when they rely on Amazon’s reports alone.

1. No True SKU-Level Profitability Visibility

Amazon reports revenue well — but profitability is fragmented.

To calculate real profit, sellers must manually combine:

  • Payments reports

  • FBA fee reports

  • Advertising spend

  • Refunds & reimbursements

  • Storage and removal fees

Even then, Amazon doesn’t provide:

  • Net profit per SKU

  • Profit trends over time

  • Fee impact by category or size tier

Why this matters:

Many sellers unknowingly scale SKUs that:

  • Look profitable at revenue level

  • Are losing money after ads, returns, and fees

Without SKU-level profit tracking, decision-making becomes guesswork.

2. Returns Data Exists — But Without Root Cause Analysis

Amazon shows:

  • Number of returns

  • High-level return reasons

What it does not show:

  • Return trends tied to listing edits

  • Supplier or batch-level issues

  • Financial loss per return type

For example:

  • “Not as described” returns may spike after a listing change

  • “Defective” returns may point to a manufacturing issue

Amazon reports don’t connect these dots — sellers must do it manually.

3. Advertising Reports Are Isolated From Business Reality

Amazon Ads reports focus heavily on:

  • ACOS

  • ROAS

  • Clicks and impressions

But they ignore:

  • Net profit after Amazon fees

  • Returns driven by ad traffic

  • Organic sales cannibalization

  • Inventory strain caused by ads

Result:

Campaigns that look “efficient” on paper can still destroy margins.

This gap leads sellers to:

  • Over-scale ads

  • Chase ROAS instead of profit

  • Miss long-term profitability erosion

Amazon’s advertising reporting documentation is available here.

4. Account Health Reports Are Reactive, Not Preventive

Amazon’s Account Health dashboard only surfaces issues after thresholds are crossed.

Missing capabilities include:

  • Predictive risk indicators

  • Trend-based alerts

  • Correlation with operational data

For example:

  • Rising complaint trends aren’t flagged early

  • Repeated return reasons aren’t highlighted as risk signals

This makes Amazon’s account health reporting reactive by design.

Amazon’s official explanation of account health metrics can be found here.

5. Inventory Reports Ignore Financial Efficiency

Amazon inventory reports focus on:

  • Units on hand

  • Sell-through rate

  • Inventory age

What they don’t show:

  • Capital locked per SKU

  • Storage cost vs margin comparison

  • Inventory ROI

This leads to:

  • Overstocking low-margin products

  • Paying unnecessary long-term storage fees

  • Poor cash-flow decisions

Inventory decisions made without financial context often hurt profitability silently.

6. Fees Are Visible — But Not Actionable

Amazon provides detailed fee reports, but sellers still lack:

  • Fee trend analysis

  • Category-level fee benchmarking

  • Fee impact alerts

Many sellers don’t notice:

  • Gradual FBA fee increases

  • Size-tier reclassifications

  • Fee creep across SKUs

By the time margins shrink, it’s already happened.

Amazon’s official payments and fee documentation can be found here.

7. No Cross-Report Correlation

Perhaps the biggest limitation of Amazon’s native reports is that nothing connects.

Amazon does not correlate:

  • Customer complaints → returns

  • Returns → listing edits

  • Ads → inventory stress

  • Fees → margin erosion

Each report exists in isolation, forcing sellers to treat symptoms instead of root causes.

This fragmentation is one of the main reasons sellers miss early warning signs.

8. Delayed, Adjusted & Inconsistent Data

Many Amazon reports:

  • Update with delays

  • Adjust historical values

  • Use different time zones

This causes:

  • Accounting mismatches

  • Reconciliation headaches

  • Forecasting inaccuracies

For businesses operating at scale, these inconsistencies create serious reporting risk.

What Sellers Should Do Instead

To overcome these gaps, sellers should focus on:

  • Centralizing Amazon data

  • Tracking net profitability per SKU

  • Linking ads, returns, and inventory

  • Monitoring trends, not snapshots

This is where purpose-built Amazon seller tools provide value — not by replacing Amazon reports, but by connecting them.

If you want unified visibility across profitability, operations, and risk, you can explore tools designed for this purpose.

Final Thoughts

Amazon’s native reports are necessary — but not sufficient.

They are built for compliance and transactions, not for strategic decision-making. Sellers who rely on them alone often miss profitability leaks, operational risks, and early warning signs.

Understanding these reporting gaps is the first step toward building a smarter, more resilient Amazon business — one driven by insight, not hindsight.